Minnesota Senate Building Named Project of the Year by Regional DBIA Chapter

A 293,000-square-foot facility designed to stand for a century, the Minnesota Senate Building overcame a design restart and politics to come together in a short 20 months.

On March 15, the newest addition to the historic Minnesota Capitol District received the highest honor given by the Design-Build Institute of America-Upper Midwest Region, named 2017 Project of the Year. The team honored included BWBR along with Pickard Chilton and Mortenson Construction.

Designed to give greater citizen access to the legislative process and house all 67 senators and their staff, the Minnesota Senate Building exceeded costs and schedule goals by utilizing design-build methodologies. Originally started in fall 2013, the project was put on hold in early 2014 before moving forward with a redesign and then starting construction in August 2014. The building opened January 2016 to accommodate the 2016 legislative session while the Minnesota Capitol remained closed for a major renovation.

“The facility is very deserving of the recognition,” said Eric West, AIA, senior project manager at BWBR and on the project. “Beyond the hurdles of coming to life in a short timeframe, the Minnesota Senate Building is a beautiful facility that represents the best of Minnesota craftsmanship as well as architecture for the greater good. It’s a natural extension of the historic Minnesota Capitol that will serve the residents’ interest in the legislative process for generations.”

The building provides ample space to enhance the public’s connection to senators, including a wide public forum with panoramic views to the Minnesota Capitol, a 250-seat theater-style hearing room – the largest hearing room in any legislative building in the Capitol Complex – and two 150-seat hearing rooms which also accommodates accessibility needs. The team designed a connection to an existing tunnel underneath University Avenue and a light rail line to provide parking access under the Senate Building to the state Capitol, including for those with mobility needs.

A year-round working facility, the Minnesota Senate Building also supports more than 360 staff members and state employees who are officed in the facility, including critical IT infrastructure and a broadcast studio.

Facing immense budget pressure to hit the targeted cost-per-square foot goal, the team also had to respond to the pressure of delivering a legacy building that was extremely energy efficient. Engineers worked with the design-build team to achieve both, saving more than $500,000. That and other savings was reinvested into such items like an LED lighting system to reduce operational costs for the state. Designed to Minnesota B3 sustainability standards, the Minnesota Senate Building achieves a 37-percent energy savings compared to the baseline code.

Other members of the design-build team included EVS Inc. (civil engineer); Ericksen Roed & Associates (structural engineer); Dunham Associates (mechanical/electrical design engineer); Horwitz (mechanical design-builder); Gephart Electric (electrical design-builder); and Coen+Partners (landscape architect).

The Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA) is an association of leaders in the design and construction industry utilizing design-build and integrated project delivery methods to achieve high performance projects. Founded in 1993 and headquartered today in Washington D.C., DBIA offers its members opportunities for education, networking, information, and advocacy. There are 14 regional offices to make information and education available throughout the nation. The Upper Midwest Regions represents Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota for the Design-Build Institute of America.

Investing in Behavioral Health for Better Outcomes

Construction costs for most health care projects are often viewed through the lens of cost-per-square foot or cost-per-bed. The challenge with such views is that they may overlook the qualitative and effective strategies that could improve outcomes, reduce staff injuries, and change the way the community looks at mental health care. Changing the view to see costs through the lenses of operations, opportunities, and society, new valuations emerge to measure the investments in behavioral health spaces.

How and where we offer mental health care matters, but roadblocks exist. Organizations providing behavioral health care struggle with reimbursement rates, staff recruitment and retention, aging facilities, insufficient policies, lack of education about mental illness, and societal stigma. Finding the pathways to overcome these obstacles will not be done by any single entity; rather, it will be achieved by a larger community determined to invest in higher quality care for those with mental illness and for preventative care and well-being.